Listen to this article

You can use statements such as “I understand that….”, “I can hear that you feel…”, “I get what you are telling me…”, “I understand how you feel.” “They jump into problem-solving, saying something validating, but then immediately tell the person what they should have done or what they should do next,” she says. “They don’t let that validation sink in. It’s like putting on anti-itch cream and then immediately washing it off.”

The foundation of validation psychology is the need for social acceptance. When people receive confirmation, they feel more secure and confident in interaction. Alexander Draghici is a licensed Clinical Psychologist, CBT practitioner, and content writer for various mental health websites. His work focuses mainly on strategies designed to help people manage and prevent two of the most common emotional problems – anxiety and depression. To come up with a validating statement, all you need to do is get in touch with the other person’s feelings and reflect them back.

This isn’t the same as colluding with a schema of hopelessness, it says, I see you’re hurt. You can think of validation as a combination of listening to understand and expressing that understanding while being open to correction if necessary. Taking these steps allows the other person to know that you can see their point of view. When I first learned about this and other validation skills as a therapist, I wasn’t blown away by the novelty of them. But the transformative power they hold becomes apparent once you’ve memorised them, honed them and internalised when to use them. So, reviewing the specific approaches I’ve covered as needed, test them out in your own interactions with others, remember to fall back on easier skills when necessary, and continue to practise.

If an individual repeatedly checks whether others have liked or commented on their content, uncertainty may contribute to stress. They may delete posts that receive little attention, repeatedly edit captions, or become preoccupied with how others perceive them. In high-conflict relationships, the way a conversation begins can set the tone for everything that follows. John and Julie Gottman’s soft start-up technique encourages couples to begin conversations gently to avoid triggering defensiveness or escalating conflict (Gottman et al., 1998; Gottman, 2011). I would add that within that soft start-up, including a specific and intentional validating statement can make a powerful difference—especially for a couple stuck in repetitive, emotionally charged dynamics.

In fact, many psychological struggles can be traced back to environments where feelings were invalidated. On the flip side, validation builds trust, improves problem-solving, and strengthens bonds. Understanding why people seek validation online requires examining psychological needs related to belonging, self-esteem, social comparison, reward, and emotional regulation. Recognising these patterns can help individuals develop a healthier relationship with social media without giving up its positive opportunities for connection and self-expression. The relationship between social media users and lower levels of self-esteem was further demonstrated by research (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Adolescents in particular are more vulnerable to these effects of external validation because they are still processing the formation of their self-concept.

The First Step In Validation: Acknowledgement

Validation gives someone the gift of being seen and heard, and also leaves room to explore other aspects of the situation. Invalidation between ideologically polarized groups increases polarization. It can be very tempting to vilify another person when someone you love is struggling with that person’s behavior. This is often not supportive to the person sharing their pain especially if they are close to or even love the person who has hurt them. Telling someone not to let something bother them often makes us feel better because it seems to take the problem off the table.

Aside from filling in or assisting someone, there are plenty of other meaningful, albeit less flashy, ways to Take Action in your relationships. The actions taken are almost always welcomed in these sorts of scenarios, and their impact often far exceeds the effort that goes into them. This isn’t about just being helpful; these actions show that you value, care about, and are emotionally attuned to the other person. Equalising communicates that a person’s reaction is reasonable or justified, using a somewhat different approach. Copying has you reflect or mirror another person’s words or behaviour.

Mindfulness can help individuals become more aware of their behavior online. Instead of automatically scrolling or checking notifications, a person can pause and observe what they are feeling. For example, someone might notice that they are opening an application because they feel lonely, bored, anxious, or uncertain about themselves. Recognizing the emotional trigger creates an opportunity to choose a healthier response.

Counselling For Relationships

But well-intentioned people may be uncomfortable with intense emotions or believe that they are helping when they are actually invalidating. Invalidation disrupts relationships and creates emotional distance. When people invalidate themselves, they create alienation from the self and make building their identity very challenging. Emotional invalidation is when a person’s thoughts and feelings are rejected, ignored, or judged. Invalidation is emotionally upsetting for anyone, but particularly hurtful for someone who is emotionally sensitive. Level five is normalizing or recognizing emotional reactions that anyone would have.

• Empathy skills include taking action, emoting, and disclosing.
• By taking these steps towards intersectional activism and amplifying voices, individuals can play a role in creating a more equitable society where everyone has access to equal opportunities and rights.
• It is common that we’ve had a similar experience that we can share so that the other person feels more connected and understood by us.
• Pay attention to what the body language of the other person is saying.
• Someone who receives fewer likes than their peers may begin wondering whether they are less attractive, successful, interesting, or socially valued.

Certain parts of a person’s experience might be valid even when other parts are invalid. For example, if someone has been led to believe that there is an imminent threat of an alien invasion, they would understandably feel anxious and fearful. It also makes sense that https://wing-talks.com this individual would vote for a politician who has a plan for dealing with the alien invasion. Their thoughts in this scenario are invalid as they’re based on misinformation, but their emotions and behaviour are reasonable given the misinformation they are operating on. Importantly, focusing on the valid parts of someone’s response will make you much more effective in challenging the invalid aspects of it.

Evidence suggests that these practices can enhance self-worth and self-esteem. Authenticity indicators, such as consistent posting patterns and engagement with diverse content, can help differentiate between genuine and inauthentic interactions on social media. Managing online personas by avoiding overly curated content can also promote authenticity.

Signalling that you’re listening to someone might not seem particularly validating, but attention is critical to connection. It’s also the easiest way to engage when you don’t agree with, understand, or empathise with another person’s perspective. If politics have driven a wedge in your relationship, for example, Attending might be the only skill you can use to keep the inevitable conversations civil. Importantly, it not only demonstrates interest and nonjudgment but also helps to cultivate these qualities in ways that foster actual dialogue. Seeking professional help can be a useful strategy for individuals who experience negative effects from their social media use.

Separate Yourself From Their Feelings – Maintain differentiation by managing your own emotional state and resisting the urge to make their distress about you. When Shawna was a teenager, she almost drowned in a large pond. She was a poor swimmer and swam out further than she realized.

Not every opinion requires a response, and not every criticism deserves personal interpretation. Developing emotional boundaries can help individuals protect their psychological well-being. The emotional impact of online validation varies from person to person. For others, the absence of engagement can significantly affect mood.

Together, these skills help the other person feel deeply understood. Validation is a compassionate invitation to connect across our differences. It is the act of recognizing and affirming the reality of someone’s feelings, thoughts, or experience even if you don’t agree with them. As world-renowned validation expert Dr. Marsha Linehan puts it, validation is “finding the kernel of truth in another person’s perspective or situation” (Linehan, 1997). You do not believe, in your heart, that what the person is saying is factual. It’s possible to validate a person’s experience without agreeing with their perspective.

Instead of moving toward mutual understanding, which is a hallmark of mutual validation, the example presented here is marked by quite the opposite. In light of the current conversation, perhaps it is useful to think of problematic relationships as relationships that are markedly devoid of validation. In fact, it may well be the case that mutual validation is a core feature of any truly loving relationship. In his book I Hear You, Michael Sorensen offers the benefits of validation to build extraordinary relationships. Effective validation can reduce frustration and fear, as well as enhance excitement in others. To be actively listening, you must do something more than just hear.

“Given your history of almost drowning, of course you panicked when you were pushed into water. Anyone with a history of drowning would probably react the same way.” Kiki Fehling, Ph.D., is co-author of Self-Directed DBT Skills. She specializes in DBT, BPD, trauma, self-harm, and LGBTQ+ mental health. While Understanding is saying, “Of course, you specifically feel that way because of what you’ve been through,” acknowledging the valid is saying, “Of course, you feel that way because anyone would.” With this technique, you want to guess what you think the person may be feeling, even if they haven’t explicitly told you.

My silly little interview wasn’t just about me; it was a moment for us. Equalising isn’t more or less validating than Contextualising. It is particularly important when a person tends to doubt their own reactions to what they experience. Research suggests that of all the non-verbal behaviours you might use in a conversation, these are among the most effective at signalling attention, connection and safety.